God's Good News From the Very Beginning
A study guide · January 24, 2016 · Romans
In one paragraph
Pastor Nathan opened a detailed study of Romans 1:1-7, the letter's prescript, walking through the historical background that shapes how we read it and what Paul was actually doing in those opening lines. The sermon stayed close to the text, moving clause by clause through a passage that most readers skim past on the way to the body of the letter. By the end, his point was that the prescript is...
Read together
- Psalm 147:1 quoted at the opening as a call to praise God
- Acts 22 read aloud to illustrate the two ways of obtaining Roman citizenship, with Paul invoking his birthright citizenship to avoid scourging
- Romans 1:1-7 the main text of the sermon, examined as the prescript of the letter
- Romans 15:5 read as a closing benediction about being of one mind to glorify God
Talk about it
- Paul describes himself as a slave of Christ Jesus despite being a highly educated Roman citizen with every reason to claim status. What does it mean to you personally to think of your relationship with Jesus in those terms?
- Pastor Mark pointed out that Paul had been teaching and refining the gospel message for years before writing Romans, and that the letter reads like his core teaching rather than a personal note. How does knowing that context change the way you approach reading Romans?
- The sermon described the church at Rome as a mixed group of Jewish and Gentile Christians who had been separated and had to figure out how to be one body again. Where do you see similar tensions in the church today, and what does this letter suggest about how to handle them?
- Pastor Mark said that everyone who has received grace has also received apostleship, meaning a calling to carry the good news to others. Do you think of yourself that way? What makes that easy or hard to believe?
- The sermon closed with the prescription to always begin with grace and peace rather than argument. Think of a relationship or situation where you are tempted to lead with the argument. What would it look like in practice to lead with grace and peace instead?
